Burkitt lymphoma (BL) may be defined as an aggressive rare disorder that constitutes approximately 1% to 2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Burkitt lymphoma is known as one of the most aggressive forms of lymphoma, with a doubling time of approximately 24 hours. The term was coined after an Irish surgeon named Denis Burkitt, who first described the lymphoma in 1958, and was the first to successfully compile description of significant number of cases with the disorder. A range of intensive therapy regimen is available to choose from which depends upon local practice. The CODOX-M/IVAC is the most commonly administered regimen, first introduced as pediatric regimen in 1980 by Magrath et.al. Various regimen for Burkitt lymphoma (BL) are R-CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, BFM/GMALL/NHL regimen, Hyper-CVAD regimen, CALGB and LMB regimen, DA-EPOCH-R regimen, and other high-intensive regimens. Burkitt lymphoma is represented by three clinical sub-types: endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL), immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt lymphoma (iBL), and sporadic (sBL). These clinical sub-types share similar morphological and immunophenotypic features, while conform largely with respect to genetic makeup, and differ in exhibiting few clinical features as well as incidence pattern. Sporadic Burkitt lymphoma (sBL) is a rare disorder generally affecting all age groups. It accounts for approximately 1% of adult lymphomas and reported in areas lacking endemic malaria. Endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) is predominantly a pediatric disease or disorder, accounting for about 30% to 50% of pediatric cancer in regions with holoendemic malaria. Endemic Burkitt lymphoma (eBL) clinically differs by affecting facial bones especially the jaw. Immunodeficiency-associated Burkitt lymphoma (iBL) accounts for 10% to 40% of all HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) associated lymphomas and was the first to be recognized in HIV setting.
The CODOX-M/IVAC regimen includes cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, high-dose cytarabine, IT methotrexate, leucovorin, vincristine/ifosfamide. BFM/GMALL/NHL regimen generally consists of pre-phase treatment with prednisone and cyclophosphamide, which is then commenced by alternating chemotherapy with six cycles including doxorubicin, dexamethasone, ifosfamide, high-dose methotrexate, teniposide, cytarabine, and vincristine. It also includes triple IT therapy with cytarabine, dexamethasone, and methotrexate. Hyper-CVAD regimen which was initially developed for acute lymphoblastic leukemia includes four cycles of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, vincristine, and doxorubicin. CALGB and LMB regimens utilize prednisone and cyclophosphamide as a pre-phase cycle, followed by alternating chemotherapy cycles depending upon the risk. DA-EPOCH-R regimen consists of different approach with low concentration chemotherapy agents being exposed for long period of time as compared to that of other high-intensive regimen, comprising infusional EPOCH (cyclophosphamide, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). This regimen is specifically used in order to provide continuous exposure of cytotoxic agents to tumor cells and to bring about decrease in toxicity. Many variations of short-cycle, high intensive regimens are being developed and used in addition to these regimens.
The global Burkitt lymphoma (BL) therapeutics market can be segmented based on clinical type, drug therapy regimen, distribution channel, and region. In terms of clinical type, the market can be classified into endemic BL (eBL), immunodeficiency-associated BL (idBL), and sporadic variant (sBL). Based on drug therapy regimen, the global Burkitt lymphoma (BL) therapeutics market can be categorized into R-CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, BFM/GMALL/NHL regimen, Hyper-CVAD regimen, CALGB and LMB regimen, DA-EPOCH-R, and other high-intensive regimens. In terms of distribution channel, the market can be divided into drug stores, hospital pharmacy, online pharmacy, retail pharmacy, and others.
In terms of region, the global Burkitt lymphoma (BL) therapeutics market can be segmented into Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East & Africa, North America, and Latin America.
Key players in the global Burkitt lymphoma (BL) therapeutics market are Bedford Laboratories, Sun Pharma, Seattle Genetics, Inc., Sanofi, Mayo Clinic, Pfizer, Inc., Merck KGaA, and Cellerant Therapeutics, Inc., among others.
This study by TMR is all-encompassing framework of the dynamics of the market. It mainly comprises critical assessment of consumers' or customers' journeys, current and emerging avenues, and strategic framework to enable CXOs take effective decisions.
Our key underpinning is the 4-Quadrant Framework EIRS that offers detailed visualization of four elements:
- Customer Experience Maps
- Insights and Tools based on data-driven research
- Actionable Results to meet all the business priorities
- Strategic Frameworks to boost the growth journey
The study strives to evaluate the current and future growth prospects, untapped avenues, factors shaping their revenue potential, and demand and consumption patterns in the global market by breaking it into region-wise assessment.
The following regional segments are covered comprehensively:
- North America
- Asia Pacific
- Latin America
- The Middle East and Africa
The EIRS quadrant framework in the report sums up our wide spectrum of data-driven research and advisory for CXOs to help them make better decisions for their businesses and stay as leaders.
Below is a snapshot of these quadrants.
1. Customer Experience Map
The study offers an in-depth assessment of various customers’ journeys pertinent to the market and its segments. It offers various customer impressions about the products and service use. The analysis takes a closer look at their pain points and fears across various customer touchpoints. The consultation and business intelligence solutions will help interested stakeholders, including CXOs, define customer experience maps tailored to their needs. This will help them aim at boosting customer engagement with their brands.
2. Insights and Tools
The various insights in the study are based on elaborate cycles of primary and secondary research the analysts engage with during the course of research. The analysts and expert advisors at TMR adopt industry-wide, quantitative customer insights tools and market projection methodologies to arrive at results, which makes them reliable. The study not just offers estimations and projections, but also an uncluttered evaluation of these figures on the market dynamics. These insights merge data-driven research framework with qualitative consultations for business owners, CXOs, policy makers, and investors. The insights will also help their customers overcome their fears.
3. Actionable Results
The findings presented in this study by TMR are an indispensable guide for meeting all business priorities, including mission-critical ones. The results when implemented have shown tangible benefits to business stakeholders and industry entities to boost their performance. The results are tailored to fit the individual strategic framework. The study also illustrates some of the recent case studies on solving various problems by companies they faced in their consolidation journey.
4. Strategic Frameworks
The study equips businesses and anyone interested in the market to frame broad strategic frameworks. This has become more important than ever, given the current uncertainty due to COVID-19. The study deliberates on consultations to overcome various such past disruptions and foresees new ones to boost the preparedness. The frameworks help businesses plan their strategic alignments for recovery from such disruptive trends. Further, analysts at TMR helps you break down the complex scenario and bring resiliency in uncertain times.
The report sheds light on various aspects and answers pertinent questions on the market. Some of the important ones are:
1. What can be the best investment choices for venturing into new product and service lines?
2. What value propositions should businesses aim at while making new research and development funding?
3. Which regulations will be most helpful for stakeholders to boost their supply chain network?
4. Which regions might see the demand maturing in certain segments in near future?
5. What are the some of the best cost optimization strategies with vendors that some well-entrenched players have gained success with?
6. Which are the key perspectives that the C-suite are leveraging to move businesses to new growth trajectory?
7. Which government regulations might challenge the status of key regional markets?
8. How will the emerging political and economic scenario affect opportunities in key growth areas?
9. What are some of the value-grab opportunities in various segments?
10. What will be the barrier to entry for new players in the market?
Note: Although care has been taken to maintain the highest levels of accuracy in TMR’s reports, recent market/vendor-specific changes may take time to reflect in the analysis.